Forum Agenda-Leben
Registrierung Kalender Mitgliederliste Teammitglieder Suche Häufig gestellte Fragen Zur Startseite

Forum Agenda-Leben » Offizieller Bereich » Austausch von Informationen und Dateien » Gegen MKS-Schwindel, mit Lanka-Waffe » Hallo Gast [Anmelden|Registrieren]
Letzter Beitrag | Erster ungelesener Beitrag Druckvorschau | An Freund senden | Thema zu Favoriten hinzufügen
Neues Thema erstellen Antwort erstellen
Zum Ende der Seite springen Gegen MKS-Schwindel, mit Lanka-Waffe
Autor
Beitrag « Vorheriges Thema | Nächstes Thema »
Rolf M. Rolf M. ist männlich


Dabei seit: 26.11.2006
Beiträge: 13
Herkunft: Schweden

Gegen MKS-Schwindel, mit Lanka-Waffe Auf diesen Beitrag antworten Zitatantwort auf diesen Beitrag erstellen Diesen Beitrag editieren/löschen Diesen Beitrag einem Moderator melden       Zum Anfang der Seite springen

Hallo Leute,

Vielleicht interessiert Euch ein Ding, das ich gestern veröffentlicht habe, auf English unten - Teil 1. Als Teil 2 kommt Übersetzung von Stefan Lankas Artikel vom 01.03.2006: "Gibt es und kann es krankmachende Viren geben?".

Rolf M.


More quackery warfare: Fantasy "foot and mouth virus" "hits" UK

At my homepage www.rolf-martens.com I've added yesterday, under
"News with brief comments":


Monday, 06 August 2007 (NWBC 296) More quackery warfare:
Fantasy "foot and mouth virus" "hits" UK

2007-08-06, 23:30 GMT:

Last Friday, 03.08, a cow or possibly several cows at a farm
called Wolford or Woolford, situated near Guildford in Surrey
west of London and owned by Roger Pride, who was raising
cattle fattened for organic beef - apparently - showed
symptoms of the so-called foot and mouth disease, also called
vesicular disease since its symptoms include blisters in an
animal's mouth and close to its hoofs. (None of the many mass
media in which yesterday and today quite extensive "reports"
on this matter have appeared has cared to mention how many
cows it was - if more than one - or what were actually the
symptoms.)

The UK Department for the Environment Food and Rural Affairs
(Defra) immediately was called in for so-called "testing", and
already the same day had "ascertained" that the cow or cows in
question "was infected with" "the foot and mouth virus", after
which it ordered the first of several purported
"countermeasures" "because of this" which in the last few days
have been undertaken both in the UK itself and also in several
other countries. As described in a Defra bulletin:

[http://www.defra.gov.uk/news/latest/2007/animal-0806.htm]


"From 22:00 on 3 August, a national ban came into force across
Great Britain (excluding Northern Ireland) to prevent the
movement of susceptible animals. In both the protection and
surveillance zones, there will be requirements for increased
levels of biosecurity on farms, cleansing and disinfection of
vehicles, people and machinery moving on/off farms."


That "test result" on which this was "based" however was all
wrong. The cow or cows in question was/were not "infected
with" a "foot and mouth virus", simply because there isn't,
and never has been, any such virus at all. The disease is
caused by certain poisonings. It's not infectious, not
contagious.

It's even a fact that there are no diseasecausing viruses at
all - a fact certainly since long well-known to the
governments of the major capitalist/imperialist countries and
to their medical experts, but probably still unknown to many
among the so-called ordinary people, and therefore I shall
make the next NWBC item, No. 297, into a kind of appendix to
the present one in order once more to demonstrate this fact;
it will consist of a repetition of an article (in translation)
by the German virologist Stefan Lanka, "Are there and can
there be diseasecausing viruses?", of 01.03.2006. This article
can also be found separately at my homepage and as included in
my "UNITE! Info #256en: Another tool against the 'bird flu'
scam".

[http://rolf-martens.com/otherspubs/
060301_lanka_no_diseasecausing_viruses.html]

Further instructive articles in English on this important
matter is one from 2001 by the same virologist exposing as
utter frauds a number of "photographs" of "well-known"
(imaginary) "viruses" and a few at the English-language
website of the "klein-klein-aktion"; in German it has much
more information in the form of many articles and books.

[http://www.neue-medizin.com/lanka2.htm

http://www.klein-klein-aktion.de/contents/contents.html

http://www.klein-klein-aktion.de/]

Like the infamous big "bird flu" terror propaganda scam of
2005 - early 2006, like the even much bigger and even more
infamous "HIV"/"AIDS" terror scam and mass murder campaign
which has been going on in the world since the early / mid-
1980s and which still continues, like the mass maiming and
murdering practice of vaccinations - whose actual character of
having no positive effects whatsoever, but only introducing
dangerous poisons into the bodies of humans or animals, still
far too few people have even the slightest suspicion of today
- the massive media propaganda about there being a "contagious
foot and mouth disease" is nothing but another instrument of
terror which those small cliques of exploiters, oppressors and
mass murderers who today rule this planet are directing
against practically everybody - a part of an ongoing *quackery
warfare* in the world, in fact.

For now, this particular type of terror has reached that level
that all the 64 heads of cattle owned by Roger Pride have been
slaughtered - "culled" - as is the circumscription for it -
for no animal health protection reason at all, thus ruining
that particular farmer, and recently some 60 more, at nearby
farms, which the phantom "foot and mouth virus" will no more
"get around to haunt" than, say, No. 10 Downing Street in
London, the White House in the USA or the parliamentary
building in Tokyo, Japan. All movement of cattle, sheep and
pigs in the UK has been banned, the EU has said that it will
restrict all live animals, fresh meat and milk products from
mainland Great Britain, and the government of Japan yesterday
declared that it was banning all importation of British meat.

A farcical thing in this connection is that actually two
laboratories precisely, purportedly, "working on" how to
"combat" the fantasy "foot and mouth virus" and on producing
vaccines "against it", that is, on how to poison cows even
more, two laboratories which happen to be housed in the same
building too, at Pirbright, only some 5 kilometres from Roger
Pride's farm, namely, the US-owned commercial firm Merial and
the UK-governmental Institute of Animal Health, were both
"suspected of" having "caused" the purported "virus outbreak"
by some "sloppy handling" or other of "virus cultures" at
their "disposal". Of such a particular wrongdoing, however,
they both are quite innocent, it can easily be ascertained,
since of course there are no "cultures" either of that phantom
"virus".

It seems unlikely that this particular ongoing crime of wanton
material destruction will go quite as far, this time, as it
did in 2001, when between 6.5 million and 10 million animals
were slaughtered and values of some £8.5 thus destroyed, under
the bourgeois-mad-reactionary pretext of "combating" that
particular imaginary "virus", the "foot-and-mouth" one. But
this doesn't prevent the reactionary mass media in quite a
number of countries, of course, from screaming out quite
loudly some horrid misinformation and some at least
"ambitious" scare attempts in this connection - see some
recent articles, for instance, by:

BBC, The Independent, The Daily Mail and The Telegraph (all
UK), Le Monde (France), Die Welt (Germany), Aljazeera (Middle
East) and CNN (USA).

[http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/6932602.stm

http://news.independent.co.uk/uk/this_br...icle2838647.ece

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/ar...in_page_id=1770

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml;jsessionid=5XWLN
GM2WJ5V1QFIQMFSFFOAVCBQ0IV0?xml=/news/2007/08/06/nfoot106.xml

http://www.lemonde.fr/web/article/0,1-0@...1-941797,0.html

http://www.welt.de/politik/article108337...e_gesperrt.html

http://www.cnn.com/2007/WORLD/europe/08/06/
uk.footandmouth/index.html]



_____________________

Message posted by:
Rolf Martens
Malmö, Sweden
Phone and fax:
+46 - 40 - 124832;
rolf.martens@comhem.se
www.rolf-martens.com
______________________
08.08.2007 02:19 Rolf M. ist offline E-Mail an Rolf M. senden Homepage von Rolf M. Beiträge von Rolf M. suchen Nehmen Sie Rolf M. in Ihre Freundesliste auf
Rolf M. Rolf M. ist männlich


Dabei seit: 26.11.2006
Beiträge: 13
Herkunft: Schweden

Themenstarter Thema begonnen von Rolf M.
RE: Gegen MKS-Schwindel, mit Lanka-Waffe Auf diesen Beitrag antworten Zitatantwort auf diesen Beitrag erstellen Diesen Beitrag editieren/löschen Diesen Beitrag einem Moderator melden       Zum Anfang der Seite springen

Stefan Lanka: Are there and can there be diseasecausing viruses?

At my homepage www.rolf-martens.com I've added today, under
"News with brief comments":


Tuesday, 07 August 2007 (NWBC 297) Stefan Lanka: Are there and
can there be diseasecausing viruses?

2007-08-07, 00:03 GMT:

As an appendix to the previous item, NWBC 296, "More quackery
warfare: Fantasy 'foot and mouth virus' 'hits' UK", and in
order to disseminate once more this important article on a
matter which is no doubt still relatively unknown, I'm
bringing it here also as an NWBC item.

This article, from 01.03.2006 and as translated from the
German by me, can also be found separately at my homepage and
as included in my "UNITE! Info #256en: Another tool against
the 'bird flu' scam", of 11.04.2006.

[http://rolf-martens.com/otherspubs/06030...ng_viruses.html]


[QUOTEFreude


-------------------------------------------------------------

Newsletter klein-klein-verlag, 01.03.2006
There are no diseasecausing viruses

[Translation from the German by Rolf Martens, 08.04.2006]

[http://www.klein-klein-verlag.de/

http://klein-klein-verlag.de/pdf/Es%20gi...ine%20Viren.pdf]

-------------------------------------------------------------


ARE THERE AND CAN THERE BE
DISEASECAUSING VIRUSES?

Dr Stefan Lanka


-------------------------------------------------------------

Here's an article which makes it possible for every layman to
check on whether or not a publication contains proof of the
existence of a virus:

-------------------------------------------------------------


Viruses are defined as small objects which are produced in a
cell, which can leave the cell and the organism and can enter
a cell again, in which they can again be multiplied.

Those objects which are called viruses consist of a coat of
proteins and contain a piece of nucleic acid.

The nucleic acid of the actually existing viruses consists of
double-stranded, circularly closed DNA.

In the case of the actually existing viruses, never have
diseasecausing properties been observed; on the contrary.

Anyone who takes note of the research results of Dr Hamer,
which are scientific and thus possible to check on and to
reproduce, will realize that there cannot be any disease-
causing viruses.

Anyone who takes note of the results of evolutionary biology
and matrices research, which are scientific and thus possible
to check on and to reproduce, will realize that there in more
complex organisms, such as humans, animals and plants, cannot
be any objects which you could characterize as viruses.

If you maintain that a virus exists, you must also publish
the proof of this in a scientific publication and describe
and document all the steps undertaken for this proof to be
obtained.

Only when statements in the form of publications are possible
to check on and the results described are possible to repro-
duce can you speak of science. Everything else is not
science.

A publication about a proof of the existence of a virus of
course must contain the photos of the isolated viruses and
those of the viruses which are in the body or in the bodily
fluids. This a layman can check on in a very simple manner.

In a virus proof, the biochemical characterization of the
proteins and the nucleic acid of the virus is particularly
important. The description of a biochemical characterization
of the proteins and the nucleic acid of a virus every layman
can follow.

Whether a typical stripe pattern is reproduced and is present
as documentation of the characterization of the proteins and
the nucleic acid in the corresponding publication, this every
layman can check on EASILY and AT ONCE too.

There are three easy possibilities for a layman to check on
statements about the existence of a virus.


1. THE PHOTO OF AN ISOLATED VIRUS:

The photo of the isolated virus is the simplest thing in the
whole job of virus isolation. It takes 20 minutes for the
photo to be taken, after the virus has been isolated.

To the photo there of course belongs an accurate description
of how and by what steps the virus was isolated.

Naturally, to this there also belongs my being able to pre-
sent a photo of the virus in the organism, and this of course
must have the same appearance and the same structures as that
virus which I isolated. Here too of course is necessary also
a description of how that photo came about.

The descriptions must be so clear and made in such detail
that anyone can repeat the steps in this process and also
carry it out him/herself.

To note concerning 1.:

In the entire scientific literature, there is no photo of a
purportedly diseasecausing virus which is maintained to be a
photo of an isolated virus!

Also there is not a single photo of a purportedly disease-
causing virus which is maintained to be a photo of a virus
supposedly existing in the organism, in the blood, in the
spittle or in any other bodily fluid.


2. THE PROTEINS OF THE VIRUS:

The most important thing in the isolating of a virus is the
biochemical characterization of its component parts. How else
will you be able later to maintain that a particular protein
or a particular nucleic acid originates from a virus? How,
then, can later an indirect test work, if the proteins and
nucleic acids have never been isolated and investigated.

The proteins are separated from each other, in accordance
with their respective lengths, by means of a process called
gel electrophoresis, and are then given colouring. There
arises a stripe pattern which provides information about how
many different kinds of proteins are included in the con-
struction of the virus and what different sizes they have.

The process of separating the proteins of the virus according
to their lengths is described in detail, and the stripe pat-
tern is photographed and published. The proteins can then be
investigated, even as to their respective individual composi-
tion, in further experiments.

To note concerning 2.:

Not in one single publication is there a photo of the stripe
pattern of such proteins, separated from each other with a
gel electrophoresis process, which would be included in the
construction of a purportedly diseasecausing virus.

In those publications which maintain that diseasecausing
viruses exist, nowhere does there appear any documentation
whatsoever of a biochemical characterization of proteins from
an isolated virus.


3. THE NUCLEIC ACID OF THE VIRUS:

The nucleic acid of the virus, which has been separated from
the proteins with a simple process, is separated by means of
a process called gel electrophoresis, in accordance with the
acid's length, and is then given colouring. On the gel, a
stripe becomes visible. Nucleic acids of known lengths, which
have been separated in parallel to the nucleic acid of the
virus, provide by comparison a first hint of the length of
that isolated nucleic acid.

For further characterization of the nucleic acid of the
virus, it is cut up biochemically and the resulting parts
again separated by means of gel electrophoresis. This pro-
duces a specific stripe pattern, which has become known also
to the general public as that seen in the so-called genetic
fingerprint.

In further investigations, the more precise composition of
the nucleic acid can be investigated.

The results of these experiments of course are photographed
and published. Obviously you need proof for your statements
about how long is that nucleic acid which originates from the
virus and about what are its component parts.

The techniques mentioned here are so simple that unprepared
groups of schoolboys and schoolgirls and of journalists have
managed, guided only by the written instructions in the pub-
lications, independently and in the course of two afternoons
to isolate that virus which I isolated, to characterize it
biochemically (as described above) and to document the re-
sults.

(Including the electron microscope photographs of the iso-
lated viruses. The photographing of viruses in an organism
takes appr. 2-3 days, since the cells must be dehydrated and
chemically fixed before they are cut into waferthin slices,
which is a precondition for your seeing anything in them at
all.)

To note concerning 3.:

There is in no publication a documentation of a separation of
a nucleic acid about which it is maintained that it origi-
nates from a diseasecausing virus.

Also, there is in none of those publications which maintains
that diseasecausing viruses exist that typical stripe pat-
tern, resulting from a biochemical separation, which has be-
come known also to a broader public as that seen in the so-
called genetic fingerprint.


SUMMARY:

1.a) On the basis of a photo claimed to show a supposedly
isolated virus, any layman can check on whether something at
all has been isolated here or no: If there in that photo,
which is maintained to show an isolated virus, are parts
which differ in size, then it can be seen at once that this
is an untruth, since isolated viruses are all equally large.

It is only from the invention of the idea of an Ebola virus
on that, as is the case now with H5N1, there have been claims
about there existing sausage-shaped viruses. With H5N1 of
course, things are even merrier, since here there are circu-
lating the most different photos - all outside of scientific
publications - some of which show the purported virus as a
sausage, others showing it as an unshapely blister.

1.b) Photographs of viruses, maintained to be diseasecausing,
in a human or an animal or in a bodily fluid from any such -
in which of course such a virus is supposed to multiply and
in which it supposedly exists in vast quantities - do not
exist! This every layman can check on: Is there, or is there
not, a photo of a virus claimed to be diseasecausing, about
which it is maintained that it is found in a human or in a
bodily fluid?

All photographs of viruses which are maintained to be dis-
easecausing are photographs of quite normal component parts
of cells or of artificially produced particles. In all
scientific publications which claim that photos contained in
them are photos of diseasecausing viruses, this even is
described. Every layman who understands English can check on
this: By reading!

2.) Every layman can check on, whether in any publication
whatsoever, in which the existence of a diseasecausing virus
is maintained, the biochemical characterization of proteins
of the purported virus is described or documented. Such a
documentation and description does not exist. When proteins
with this or that property are mentioned, these never appear
directly but purportedly are being proved "indirectly".

To prove with indirect methods (for instance so-called anti-
bodies) the existence of proteins, which have earlier never
been directly proved to exist, is not possible.

The trick is easy to see through:

Proteins from the blood (globulins) simply are maintained to
be antibodies. Depending on laboratory conditions, globulins
will either combine or will not combine with other substan-
ces. If there is combining, then it is maintained that an
indirect existence proof has been obtained. This is a histo-
ric swindle with dramatic consequences.

3. Every layman can check on whether there concerning a virus
which is claimed to exist is a publication in which the bio-
chemical characterization of the nucleic acid of the virus is
described and documented. In the case of the purportedly
diseasecausing viruses, there is no such publication.

This automatically means that the so-called indirect methods
for proving the existence of a nucleic acid in the case of
the viruses claimed to be diseasecausing are only proving the
existence of such nucleic acids which were already in the
organism in beforehand. That's how simple this is!

In use today are the so-called nucleic-acid multiplication
method PCR. That method makes sense only if there is no more
than very small amounts of nucleic acid present. If there
were just a few thousand viruses present, then there would
have been no need first very laboriously to multiply nucleic
acid in order then to say, here is the nucleic acid of the
virus.

With the indirect PCR method of proof, which today is being
claimed to constitute a direct virus proof method, arbitrary
manipulation can be undertaken: Depending on what kind of
nucleic acid you use, whether DNA or RNA as source from which
to proceed, you can cause people, as is being done in the HIV
PCR test, to test arbitrarily either "positive" or "nega-
tive".

The H5N1 PCR test now in use is testing every animal and
every human positive, because that nucleic acid which is
multiplied in it and which is maintained to be specific for
H5N1 is found in every animal and every human. Thus it came
about too that today the cat at the island of Rügen was
tested "positive".

Thus it in the next few days, as I assume, will also come
about that the first human, at Rügen or on the shore of Lake
Constance - someone who, through retardation of the essential
and vital neuramidase enzymes in his or her body by means of
Tamiflu dispensing, has been poisoned in advance - will be
tested "H5N1 positive", so that the pandemic plan and the
predictions are fulfilled.


-------------------------------------------------------------

To the forum Agenda-Leben:


-------------------------------------------------------------

P.S. I shall be happy to put my degree and doctoral disserta-
tion, written in German, and my English-language publications
about my virus discovery, isolation and characterization at
the disposal of any dedicated forum member who would like to
scan them in here in order to make them available in the
forum. I hope that by this the stealing of time and causing
of confusion by certain people here in the forum, who have
played at being critical and cynical, might finally come to
an end.

Of course you can also obtain my degree and doctoral disser-
tation via the inter-library loan service of the Konstanz
university library.


[END OF QUOTE]


_____________________

Message posted by:
Rolf Martens
Malmö, Sweden
Phone and fax:
+46 - 40 - 124832;
rolf.martens@comhem.se
www.rolf-martens.com
______________________
08.08.2007 02:20 Rolf M. ist offline E-Mail an Rolf M. senden Homepage von Rolf M. Beiträge von Rolf M. suchen Nehmen Sie Rolf M. in Ihre Freundesliste auf
Penzy


Dabei seit: 04.12.2006
Beiträge: 252
Herkunft: NRW

RE: Gegen MKS-Schwindel, mit Lanka-Waffe Auf diesen Beitrag antworten Zitatantwort auf diesen Beitrag erstellen Diesen Beitrag editieren/löschen Diesen Beitrag einem Moderator melden       Zum Anfang der Seite springen

Zitiert aus Wikipedia - "Maul- und Klauenseuche"

"Bis 31. Dezember 1991 wurden in der EU zur Verhinderung einer MKS-Epidemie Pflichtimpfungen der Rinderbestände durchgeführt. Impfungen führen zu ernsthaften Handelshindernissen: Geimpfte Tiere haben wie infizierte Antikörper im Blut und können so nur bei besonders markierten Impfstoffen voneinander abgegrenzt werden. Zudem besteht die Gefahr der Erregerausbreitung über geimpfte Tiere. Daher wurden Impfungen durch die EU unterbunden und auch keine anderen Therapiemaßnahmen mehr erlaubt, obwohl die Todesrate der älteren Tiere, insbesondere bei Rindern, gering ist und die Tiere gegen diese Krankheit auch immun werden.

Bei einem MKS-Verdacht wird der betroffene Betrieb gesperrt, Schafe werden meist vorsorglich gekeult und Proben auf MKS untersucht. Weiterhin werden ein Sperrbezirk von mindestens 3 km Umkreis eingerichtet, alle Tierbestände auf MKS untersucht und Tiertransporte verboten."
08.08.2007 13:49 Penzy ist offline Beiträge von Penzy suchen Nehmen Sie Penzy in Ihre Freundesliste auf
Baumstruktur | Brettstruktur
Gehe zu:
Neues Thema erstellen Antwort erstellen
Forum Agenda-Leben » Offizieller Bereich » Austausch von Informationen und Dateien » Gegen MKS-Schwindel, mit Lanka-Waffe

Impressum

Forensoftware: Burning Board 2.3.4, entwickelt von WoltLab GmbH